Home

       Advanced Search

Central Excise & Customs

Vikram Nankani
Advocate

  1. Central Excise

    Rate Changes at a Glance:

    • Polyester Filament Yarn- 24% to 16%

    • Tyres- 24% to 16%

    • Air Conditioners- 24% to 16% (MRP abatement reduced to 30% from 35%)

    • Branded Jewellery - Introduction of 2% duty

    • Road Tractors and Semi Trailers with engine capacity greater than 1800cc - Nil to 16%

    • Mosaic Tiles- Nil to 8%

    • Steel and Steel Products- 12% to 16%

    • Re 1 per kg surcharge on Tea and Tea Waste abolished.

    • Cement Clinker- 250 per MT to 500 per MT

    • A dditional Duty of Excise of 10% imposed on Cigarettes and other Tobacco products (in case of Other Tobacco Products to be charged on an ad valorem rate)

    • Duty reduced to Nil on LPG for domestic use and Kerosene distributed under the PDS scheme.

    • Basic Excise Duty reduced from 16% to 8% ad valorem and a Specific Duty introduced on Motor Spirit (Petrol) and Special Excise Duty removed.

    • Additional Duty of Excise on Petrol & Diesel Increased from Rs. 1.5 to Rs. 2 Per litre to be used exclusively for National Highway Development Programme.

  2. Policy Statement:

    Advisory Committee to be set up to review manner of grant of abatement under the MRP regime.

    Analysis of Amendments under Central Excise

    Amendments under Central Excise Act, 1944:

    Resident Applicant for Advance Ruling Application

    The definition of "Applicant" under clause (c) of section 23A of the Central Excise Act has been substituted to include:

    • a joint venture in India; and

    • a resident falling within any such class or category of persons, as the Central Government may, specify in this behalf.

    This takes a step towards meeting the long standing demand of Indian industry and createsa level playing field with foreign entities, who could avail of the advance rulingmechanism.

    Cases referred back to Appellate Tribunal

    In case of an application filed under Section 32 E, on withdrawal of an appeal from the Appellate Tribunal under Section 32 PA, if the applicant does not cooperate in the settlement proceedings, the Commission has now been given the powers to remit such application back to the Appellate Tribunal.

    Small Section Exemption

    Notification No. 8/2003-CE, has been amended to enhance the eligibility limit for general SSI exemption from Rs. 3 Crore to Rs. 4 Crore, (Notification No.10/2005-CE). It is noteworthy that the actual exemption is only 1 crore of turnover, over which duties are payable.

    Notification No.9/2003-CE, providing concessional rate of duty of 60% of the normal rate with Cenvat credit, has been rescinded. (Notification No.11/2005-CE). Now SSI units with a turnover of between 1 crore to 3 crores will pay full duties.

    SSI units having annual turnover exceeding Rs. 40 lakh will now have to file a simple annual declaration. (Notification No.14/2005-CE refers).

    Committee of Chief Commissioners of Central Excise

    The Central Board of Excise and Customs (Board) has been empowered to constitute a committee consisting of two Chief Commissioners of Central Excise to be known as "Committee of Chief Commissioners of Central Excise". The Committee shall substitute the Commissioner of Customs for power given under Section 35B(2) to direct the proper Officer to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. Similarly all the powers given under sub section 35E (1) and (3) to the Board shall be transferred to the Committee. This should streamline the procedure for review of cases to be appealed by the department.

    Legislative Prerogative:

    Amendments made for retrospective recovery Recovery of Dues under Rule 57CC, Rule 57 D and Rule 57 AD of Central Excise Rules, 1944 or Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001. A new Explanation has been added to recover the amounts along with interest in the same manner as provided in Rule 57 I, 57 AH or Rule 12 respectively, which is for recovery of Modvat / Cenvat credit wrongly availed for the period 1.08.1996 to 28.02.2002.

    The retrospective amendments to abovementioned Rules has been made to overcome certain judgments of the Hon’ble Tribunal starting with Pushpaman Forgings vs. Cce, Mumbai 2002 (149) Elt 490 (Trib.), wherein it was held that the said amounts sought to be received under the abovementioned rules did not amount to a duty of Excise or Modvat Credit and consequently there was no mechanism in place to recover such amounts. This position has been affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Commissioner vs. Pushpaman Forgings 2003 (153) Elt A89 (SC).

    The ramifications of the said amendments are significant inasmuch as:

    1. The retrospective amendment takes the period for actualising recovery by the Excise Authorities beyond the ordinarily extended period of limitation available under the statute, which is 5 years. It is noteworthy that the 5 year limitation has a very limited and specific mandate i.e. it is to be invoked when there is an element of suppression, mis-statement with an intention to evade the payment of duty, which is not present in this case.

    2. To sustain and bolster this position of recovery, which is highly nebulous in law, the provision further attempts to preclude the jurisdiction of courts by providing that no challenge to these provisions will be entertained in a court of law. This is for obvious reasons as the Apex Court has already held against the Department in their earlier attempts for recovery.

    Refining of edible oil amounts to manufacture

    Insertion of Note 5 in Chapter 15 which defines the process of refining of edible vegetable oils as amounting to manufacture, is to get over the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in case of Shyam Oil Cake Ltd. vs. Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur 2004 (174) ELT 145 (SC)

    There has been a growing trend of overcoming adverse decisions was previously seen in the various amendment of "Manufacture" and ITC’s case qua recoveries. This present examples only emphasizes this.

    Amendment to the Central Excise Rules:

    W. E. F. 01.04.2005 Rule 12AA to be introduced in the Central Excise Rules, 2002, which provides as under:

    1. Any ‘person’ who gets articles of jewellery falling under heading 7113 of CETA, 1985, produced or manufactured on his behalf on job work basis shall have to get himself registered, maintain accounts and pay duty. It will be optional for the job worker to get himself registered and follow the Central Excise Rules.

    2. The said person will be liable to pay duty when he clears goods for home consumption or for exports from the job workers factory.

    3. This Rule will not apply to EOU and units located in SEZ.

    4. This Rule will apply only on articles of jewellery on which brand name or trade name is indelibly affixed or embossed.

    Amendment to the CENVAT Credit Rules:

    1. A domestic manufacturer will be allowed to take credit of additional duty of customs levied under sub-section (5) of section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act. This credit can be utilized for the payment of excise duty on final products (including Special Excise Duty and Additional Excise Duty)

    2. A provider of taxable service shall not be eligible to take credit of the additional duty paid under sub-section (5) of Section 3;

    3. The credit of duty paid on inputs may be taken immediately on the receipt of the inputs; Credit of the entire amount of Additional duty paid on capital goods shall also be allowed immediately on receipt of capital goods as against two installments.
       

  3. Customs

  4. Rates at a Glance:

    • Peak Rates reduced to 15%

      Selected capital goods and parts thereof to be reduced to below 15% used in/for:
       

    • Textiles -20% to 10%

    • Refrigerated Vans for Food Processing - 20% to 10%

    • Leather and Footwear goods- 20% to 5%

    • Pharmaceutical and Biotech Industry - 9 specified goods listed in List 27A of

      Notification No. 21/2002 as amended by Notification No. 11/2005)- 5%

      Battery operated Vehicles & Printing Presses and parts thereof - 20% to 10%

      Specific Goods for the Information Technology/Electronic Items – Nil (subject to end use conditions)

      Specified Telecom Network Equipment & parts- existing exemption extended beyond 31.03.2005 without a cap on tenure

    • Crude and Crude products reduced to 5% and in some cases Nil

    • Crude Petroleum Oil-10% to 5%

    • Petrol & Diesel- 15% to10%

    • Kerosene (PDS)- 5% to Nil

    • LPG (Domestic Use) - 5% to Nil

    • Other Petroleum Products- 20% to 10%

    Raw Materials:

    • Primary and Secondary Metals such as Ferrous Metals and Non-Ferrous metals such as Copper, Aluminum, Zinc etc.- 15% to 10%

    • Industrial raw Materials such as Molasses, catalysts, industrial ethyl Alcohol- 15% to 10%

    • EVA used in Footwear Manufacture - 20% to 5%

    • Coking coal (high Ash content) - 15% -5%

    • Lead - 5%

    Textiles:

    • Polyester and Nylon chips, textile Fibres, yarns and intermediates, fabrics, garments etc.- 20% to 15%

    Information Technology Items

    • All 217 items under Information Technology Agreement - Nil (subject to a countervailingduty of 4%)

    • Software- Nil

    • Optical Fibre cables (8544.70) enlisted in ITA - 15% to Nil (subject to CVD of 4%);

      Optical Fibre cable/bundles (9001.10) -20% to 10%

    Ad valorem rate of Customs Duty on goods brought in as passenger baggage reduced to 35%.

    Analysis of Legislative amendments under Customs

    Resident Applicant for Advance Ruling Application

    • The definition of applicant under clause (c) of section 28E of the Customs Act,1962, has been substituted to include:

    a joint venture in India; and

    a resident falling within any such class or category of persons, as the Central Government may, specify in this behalf.

    This takes a step towards meeting the long standing demand of Indian industry and creates a level playing field with foreign entities, who could avail of the advance ruling mechanism.

    Additional issue for admission in Advance Ruling

    Application to Advance Ruling can be made for "determination of Rules of Origin of goods and matters relating there to".

    Cases referred back to Appellate Tribunal

    In case of an application filed under Section 127 B, on withdrawal of an appeal from the Appellate Tribunal under Section 127MA, if the applicant does not cooperate in the settlement proceedings, the Commission has now been given the powers to remit such application back to the Appellate Tribunal.

    Committee of Chief Commissioners of Customs

    The Board has been empowered to constitute a committee consisting of two Chief Commissioners of Customs to be known as "Committee of Chief Commissioners of Customs". The Committee shall substitute the Commissioner of Customs for power given under Section 129A(2) to direct the proper Officer to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.

    Similarly all the powers provided under sub section 129D(1) and (3) to the Board shall be transferred to the Committee.

    Additional duty of customs under section 3 Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (‘CTA’)

    The new section 3, inter alia, enables the Government to impose an additional duty, at a rate not exceeding 4% ad valorem, to countervail the sales tax, value added tax, local taxes and other charges leviable on like goods on their sale or purchase or transportation in India.

    Value for the purposes of the said levy would include the assessable value, basic customs duty, any sum chargeable as a duty of customs under section 12 of the Customs Act and the additional duty of customs leviable under sub-section (1) of section 3 of CTA, but shall exclude the countervailing duty referred to in section 9 of CTA, anti-dumping duty referred to in section 9A of CTA and safeguard duty referred to in sections 8B and 8C of CTA.

    The Additional levy will not be included in the assessable value for the purposes of levy of Education Cess on imported goods (Notification No. 20/2005- Customs refers).

    For the present, this additional duty at 4% has been imposed with immediate effect from 1st March 2005 only on items bound under the Information Technology Agreement, and on specified inputs/raw materials for manufacture of electronics/IT goods. However, ITsoftware and documents of title conveying the right to use IT software will not be subject to this levy. It may be noted that except for these goods, this duty will not apply to any other goods for the present (Notification No. 19/2005- Customs refers).

    The levy of the additional duty of 4% on NIL rated products under the Information Technology Agreement, may be subject to a WTO challenge.

 

Disclaimer | Classifieds | Feedback | Contact Us
Site designed and managed by Finesse Multimedia Pvt. Ltd.
Best viewed in 800x600 using IE4+