Home

       Advanced Search

Banking Cash Transaction Tax

Vijay Kakwani
Advocate

  1. 1. Introduction

    "BLACK" is not the movie by Shri Sanjay Leela Bansali that I am talking about, but the colour of the money, the Hon’ble Finance Minister Shri P. Chidambaram, sees in
    the economy.

    In para 177 of his Budget 2005-06 Speech he states "The NCMP requires the Government to introduce special scheme to unearth black money and assets. I am obliged to carry out the mandate, but without giving undeserved relief or an amnesty. I am concerned about large cash transaction, especially withdrawals of cash, when there is no ostensible purpose to withdraw such large amounts of cash. These cash withdrawals leave no trail, and presumably become part of the black economy. Therefore, I propose to introduce two anti tax-evasion measures: Firstly, I propose to levy a tax on withdrawal of cash on a single day of over Rs. 10,000 or more from banks at the rate of 0.1 per cent. Thus, a person withdrawing Rs. 10,000 in case would have to pay a small sum of Rs. 10. ……"

    Surprisingly, this was the only item in the Budget Speech which created an uproar, an immediate and loud uproar, from the Members of the Parliament. I wonder
    ‘WHY ?’ { ; ) }

    Back to the issue, a few questions come to my mind:

    1. the reason for levy of this tax?

    2. the reason of charging a nominal sum of Rs. 10 per Rs. 10,000, when the cost of maintaining the records and filing the returns by the scheduled banks would be much higher?

    3. does he want the money or the
      records?

    4. does he have the infrastructure to analyse such voluminous records?

    5. do the banks especially in the rural and backward areas, have the infrastructure to collect and maintain such records?

    It is obvious that he wants the records and the levy of tax is only to ensure that the records are duly collected and duly filed by the scheduled banks.

    What are the figures that we are talking about?
    According to news reports, Rs. 11.5 lakh crore black money is generated every year. Rs. 3.5 lakh crore is the tax loss every year.

    Compare it with the
    Budget Estimates for 2005-06.

    Total expenditure estimated at Rs. 5.14 lakh crore
    Total Revenue receipts of Central Govt. estimated at Rs. 3.51 lakh crore
    Total Revenue Exp. of Central Govt. estimated at Rs. 4.47 lakh crore
    Revenue Deficit estimated at Rs. 0.95 lakh crore
    Fiscal Deficit estimated at Rs. 1.51 lakh crore

    On comparison, the Hon’ble F. M. has a reason to be upset.

    Let us analyse the earlier schemes of the Government to unearth black money and to what extent they were effective.

    According to news reports, the figures of the several amnesty schemes are as under:

    Schemes Year No. of cases Income declared (in Rs. crore) Tax collected (in Rs. crore)
    Income tax Investigation  Commission 1946-47 48 30
    VDS (Voluntary Deposit Scheme) 1951 20,912 70.2 10.89
    Voluntary Deposits Scheme I 1965 2001 52,18 30.8
    Voluntary Deposits Scheme II 1966 1,14,226 145 19.45
    U/s. 271 of Income-tax Act 1965-66 22 NA
    Voluntary Deposits of Income & Wealth Act 1975 2,58,992 1587.8 256.7
    Special Bearer Bond Scheme 1980 400 160
    Finance Act, 1985 1985 1,53,990 2940.37 388.03
    Voluntary Disclosure Scheme 1991 984
    Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme 1997 4,70,000 33,000 10,100

    By and large, the Schemes met with limited success. Also, due to regularity of the Schemes (every 5 years) people waited for a scheme rather than disclose regular income. Also, the rate of tax was a deterrent. The rates were as high as 97% in earlier years and people would rather not show the income. Reports also suggest that the schemes in fact generated black money. Many people declared their future black money earnings. People declared gold and diamond jewellery which they did not even possess. Thus, they turned their future black money into white.

    The Government tried unearthing black money through extensive search and seizure actions. Fabulous assessments were made. However, what was sustained at the Appellate Tribunal level were a mere pittance to the assessments made.

    The Government tried reducing the tax rates. This brought in more revenue. The regular assessee’s brought in more taxes, the non assessee continued to default. The menace of black money continued.

    Why do we need black money?
    Some of the reasons why black money is needed can be:

    1. to buy a property and save on stamp duty

    2. to sell a property and to save on capital gains

    3. to secure admission to a school/college for your child

    4. to buy gold/jewellery

    5. for trips, tours, etc.

    6. to get a suitable job

    7. to get a suitable posting

    8. to get favourable orders/decisions

    9. to get tenders, etc.

    Where does this money lie?
    This money is possibly stashed away in various ways:

    1. in cash

    2. in gold/jewellery

    3. in immovable property and renovation

    4. in stock market

    5. in cars

    6. in household items

    7. in paintings

    8. in illegal business

    9. in foreign bank accounts

    10. in banks, etc.

    It is this money which is lying in the banks, that the F. M. has an eye upon. Though, in a later interview on television he has stated that he will withdraw the tax, but he also added that if not in this way, but in some other way ‘we will get you’.

    To understand the mind of the F. M. let us analyse the various proposed provisions of the Banking Cash Transaction Tax.
     

  2. Analysis

    1. Scope and extent
      This Chapter extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. [Section 93(1)]

      Application

      It shall apply to taxable banking transactions entered into on or after the commencement of this Chapter. [Section 93(3)]
       

    2. Commencement Date
      This Chapter shall come into force on the 1st day of June, 2005.
      [Section 93(2)]
       

    3. Definitions

      1. "Appellate Tribunal" means the Appellate Tribunal constituted under section 252 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. [Section 94(1)]

      2. "Assessing Officer" means the Income-tax Officer or Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax or Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax or Joint Commissioner of Income-tax or Additional Commissioner of Income-tax who is authorised by the Board to exercise or perform all or any of the powers and functions conferred on, or assigned to, an Assessing Officer under this Chapter. [Section 94(2)]

      3. "Banking Cash Transaction Tax" means tax leviable on the taxable banking transactions under the provisions of this Chapter. [Section 94(3)]

      4. "Board" means the Central Board of Direct Taxes constituted under the Central Board of Revenue Act, 1963. [Section 94(4)]

      5. "Person" shall have the same meaning as in section 2(31) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and includes an office or establishment of the Central Government or the Government of a State. [Section 94(5)]

      6. "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made by the Board under this Chapter. [Section 94(6)]

      7. "Scheduled Bank" means the State Bank of India constituted under the State Bank of India Act, 1955, a subsidiary bank as defined in the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959, a corresponding new bank constituted under section 3 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970, or under section 3 of the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980, or any other bank being a bank included in the Second Schedule to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. [Section 94(7)]

      8. "taxable banking transaction" means—

        1. a transaction, being withdrawal of cash (by whatever mode) exceeding ten thousand rupees on any single day by a person from any scheduled bank; or

        2. a transaction, being purchase of a bank draft or banker’s cheque or any other financial instrument on payment of cash exceeding ten thousand rupees on any single day by a person from any scheduled bank; or

        3. a transaction, being receipt of cash from any scheduled bank exceeding ten thousand rupees on any single day by a person on encashment of term deposit, whether on maturity or otherwise, from that bank. [Section 94 (8)]

      9. Those words and expressions used but not defined in this Chapter and defined in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the Income-tax Act, 1961, or the rules or regulations made thereunder, shall apply, so far as may be, in relation to banking cash transaction tax.
        [Section 94 (9)]
         

    4. Charge and rate of tax

      There shall be charged a banking cash transaction tax, in respect of every taxable banking transaction of the value exceeding ten thousand rupees and entered into on or after the 1st day of June, 2005, at the rate of 0.1 per cent of the value of every such taxable banking transaction. [Section 95(1)]

      The banking cash transaction tax shall be payable,—

      1. in respect of taxable banking transaction, being withdrawal of cash (by whatever mode) exceeding ten thousand rupees on any single day from any scheduled bank by the person who withdraws the cash from the scheduled bank, on the amount of cash withdrawn; or

      2. in respect of taxable banking transaction, being purchase of a bank draft or banker’s cheque or any other financial instrument on payment of cash exceeding ten thousand rupees on any single day from any scheduled bank by the person who purchases the bank draft or banker’s cheque or any other financial instrument from the scheduled bank, on the amount of cash deposited; or

      3. in respect of taxable banking transaction, being receipt of cash from any scheduled bank exceeding ten thousand rupees on any single day, on encashment of term deposit, whether on maturity or otherwise, from that bank by the person who received the cash on encashment of term deposit, on the amount of cash received on encashment of term deposit.

      Exception : No banking cash transaction tax shall be payable if the amount of term deposit is credited to any account with the bank.
       

    5. Collection and recovery [Section 97]

      Every scheduled bank shall collect the banking cash transaction tax from every person, being a person who enters into a taxable banking transaction with that bank, at the rate specified in section 95.

      The banking cash transaction tax collected during any calendar month shall be paid by every scheduled bank to the credit of the Central Government by the fifteenth day of the month immediately following the said calendar month.

      The scheduled bank, who fails to collect the tax in accordance with the provisions of this section shall, notwithstanding such failure, be liable to pay the tax to the credit of the Central Government by the fifteenth day of the month immediately following the said calendar month.
       

    6. Return [Section 98]

      Every scheduled bank (i.e., ‘assessee’ for the purpose of this Chapter) is required to:

      1. within the prescribed time after the end of each financial year,

      2. prepare a return in respect of all taxable banking transactions entered into during such financial year in the scheduled bank, in such form and verified in such manner and setting forth such particulars as may be prescribed and

      3. deliver or cause to be delivered to the Assessing Officer or to any other authority or agency authorised by the Board in this behalf.

      Where any assessee fails to furnish the return within the prescribed time, the Assessing Officer may issue and serve a notice to such assessee, requiring him to furnish the return.
       

    7. Revised return

      Any assessee who has not furnished the return within the time allowed, or having furnished a return, discovers any omission or wrong statement therein, may furnish a return or a revised return, as the case may be, at any time before the assessment is made.
       

    8. Assessment [Section 99]

      The Assessing Officer may serve on any assessee, who has furnished a return [u/s. 98(3)(1)] or upon whom a notice has been served [u/s. 98(2)] (whether a return has been furnished or not), a notice requiring him to produce or cause to be produced on a date to be specified therein such accounts or documents or other evidence as the Assessing Officer may require, for the purposes of making an assessment.

      The Assessing Officer may, from time to time, serve further notices requiring the production of such further accounts or documents or other evidence as he may require.

      The Assessing Officer, after considering such accounts, documents or other evidence, if any, as he has obtained and after taking into account any other relevant material which he has gathered, shall, by an order in writing, assess the value of taxable banking transactions during the relevant financial year and determine the amount of banking cash transaction tax payable or refundable on the basis of such assessment.

      However, no assessment shall be made under this sub-section after the expiry of two years from the end of the relevant financial year.

      On assessment being completed and in case any amount is refunded to it on assessment, every assessee, shall, within such time as may be prescribed, refund such amount to the concerned person from whom such amount was collected.
       

    9. Amendment or Rectification of mistake apparent from the record [Section 100]

      The Assessing Officer may, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by him.

      However, this rectification can be carried out only within one year from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be amended was passed. [Section 100 (1)]

      Where any matter has been considered and decided in any proceeding by way of appeal, the Assessing Officer passing such order may, notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, amend the order, in relation to any matter other than the matter which has been so considered and decided. [Section 100 (2)]

      The Assessing Officer may, subject to the other provisions of this section, make an amendment [u/s. 100 (1)] of his own motion; or if any mistake is brought to his notice by the assessee. [Section 100(3)]

      No amendment, which has the effect of enhancing an assessment or reducing a refund or otherwise increasing the liability of the assessee, shall be made, unless the Assessing Officer concerned has given notice to the assessee of his intention so to do and has allowed the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. [Section 100(4)]

      The order of amendment passed by the Assessing Officer, shall be in writing.
      [Section 100(5)]

      Where any such amendment has the effect of reducing the assessment, the Assessing Officer shall, subject to the other provisions of this Chapter, make any refund, which may be due to such assessee. [Section 100 (6)]

      Where any such amendment has the effect of enhancing the assessment or reducing the refund already made, the Assessing Officer shall, make an order specifying the sum payable by the assessee and the provisions of this Chapter shall apply accordingly.
       

    10. Interest on delayed payment [Section 101]

      Every assessee who fails to credit the banking cash transaction tax or any part thereof, to the account of the Central Government within the period specified, shall pay simple interest at the rate of one per cent of such tax for every month or part of a month by which such crediting of the tax or any part thereof is delayed.
       

    11. Penalty for failure to collect or pay tax [Section 102]

      Any assessee who has failed to collect the whole or any part of the banking cash transaction tax as required shall be liable to pay by way of penalty in addition to paying the tax or interest, a sum equal to the amount of banking cash transaction tax that it has failed to collect.

      Any assessee who having collected the banking cash transaction tax, fails to pay such tax to the credit of the Central Government as required shall be liable to pay by way of penalty; a sum of one thousand rupees for every day during which the failure continues, however, that the penalty under this clause shall not exceed the amount of banking cash transaction.

      No order imposing a penalty shall be made unless the assessee has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
       

    12. Penalty for failure to file return [Section 103]

      If an assessee fails to furnish in due time the return which it is required to furnish (u/s. 98(1)] or by notice [u/s. 98(2)], it shall be liable to pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues.

      No order imposing a penalty shall be made unless the assessee has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
       

    13. Penalty for failure to comply with notice [Section 104]

      If the Assessing Officer, in the course of any proceedings under this Chapter, is satisfied that any person has failed to comply with a notice u/s. 99(1), he may direct that such person shall pay, by way of penalty, in addition to any banking cash withdrawal transaction tax and interest, if any, payable by him, a sum of ten thousand rupees for each such failure.

      No order imposing a penalty shall be made unless the assessee has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
       

    14. Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases [Section 105]

      No penalty shall be imposable for any failure referred to in sections 102, 103 and 104, if the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the said failure.
       

    15. Application of certain provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961 [Section 106]

      The provisions of the following sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as in force from time to time, shall apply, so far as may be, in relation to banking cash transaction tax as they apply in relation to income-tax:—

      Sections 120, 131, 133A, 156, 178, 220 to 227, 229, 232, 260A, 261, 262, 265 to 269, 278B, 282 and 288 to 293.
       

    16. Appeals to Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [Section 107]

      An assessee aggrieved by any assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s. 99, or u/s.100, or by an order levying penalty or by an assessee denying his liability to be assessed under this Chapter, shall be entitled to file an appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) within thirty days from the date of receipt of the order of the Assessing Officer.

      The appeal shall be filed in the prescribed form and shall be verified in the prescribed manner and shall be accompanied by a fee of one thousand rupees.

      Where an appeal has been filed under the provisions of sub-section (1) of this section, the provisions of sections 249 to 251 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, shall, as far as may be, apply.

      1. Section 249 of the Income-tax Act deals with the form and limitation.

      2. Section 250 of the Income-tax Act deals with the procedure in appeal.

      3. Section 251 of the Income-tax Act deals with the powers of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals).

    17. Appeals to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal [Section 108]

      Any assessee aggrieved by an order passed by a Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) will have a right to file a second appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against such order.

      The Commissioner of Income-tax may, if he objects to any order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), direct the Assessing Officer to appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against such order.

      The appeal shall be in the prescribed form, verified in the prescribed manner, and shall be accompanied by a fee of one thousand rupees and shall be filed within sixty days of the date on which the order sought to be appealed against is received by the assessee, or by the Commissioner of Income-tax, as the case may be.

      Where an appeal has been filed before the Appellate Tribunal, the provisions of sections 252 to 255 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, shall, as far as may be, apply.
       

    18. Imprisonment and fine, in case of false statement in verification, etc. by any person. [Sections 109 and 110]

      If a person (not necessarily an assessee) makes a statement in any verification under this Chapter or any rule made thereunder, or delivers an account or statement, which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false, or does not believe to be true, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine.

      Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, an offence punishable under this section shall be deemed to be non-cognizable offence, within the meaning of that Code.

      No proceeding against any person for any offence under section 109 shall be carried except with the previous sanction of the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax.
       

    19. Power to the Central Government to make Rules [Section 111]

      The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Chapter.

      The Central Government may, without prejudice to the generality of the above power, make such rules to provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:—

      1. the time within which the return shall be delivered or caused to be delivered to the Assessing Officer or to any other agency and (b) the form and the manner in which such return shall be furnished.

      2. the time within which the return shall be furnished on receipt of notice u/s. 98(2);

      3. the time within which refund shall be made u/s. 99(3);

      4. the form in which an appeal u/s. 107 or 108 may be filed and the manner in which they may be verified;

      5. any other matter which by this Chapter is to be, or may be, prescribed.

      The rules made by the Central Government, under this Chapter, shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid. If both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule.
       

    20. Power to the Central Government to remove difficulties [Section 112]

      In case if any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Chapter, the Central Government has been given the power to remove the difficulty, by order published in the Official Gazette. However, such order shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of this Chapter.

      Restriction: No such order shall be made after the expiry of a period of two years from the date on which the provisions of this Chapter come into force.

      Every order made by the Central Government under this section shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament.

    NOTE:

    1. Though the above read as ‘sections’, they are in fact ‘clauses’ of the Chapter VII of the Finance Bill, 2005, but are referred to as sections to maintain the continuity with the ad verbitum reading of the clauses.

    2. It is proposed to introduce a new clause in sub-section (1) of section 36 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 so as to allow deduction in respect of banking cash transaction tax paid by the assessee during the year on the taxable banking transactions entered by him

 

Disclaimer | Classifieds | Feedback | Contact Us
Site designed and managed by Finesse Multimedia Pvt. Ltd.
Best viewed in 800x600 using IE4+