1.1 Rarely would one
find a Finance Bill in which some amendments are not proposed in
the realm of Tax Deduction at Source. Either some new item
requiring TDS on the payments for it gets proposed or the Bill
proposes some administrative changes.
1.2 The Finance Bill,
2005 (FB05) has 6 clauses dealing with proposals for amendments
of TDS provisions. They are:
|
Clause |
Section |
w.e.f. |
|
48:00:00 |
Amendment of section 194A |
1/6/05 |
|
49:00:00 |
Amendment of section 194C |
1/6/05 |
|
50:00:00 |
Amendment of section 199 |
1/4/05 |
|
51:00:00 |
Amendment of section 203 |
1/4/05 |
|
52:00:00 |
Insertion of new section 206A |
1/6/05 |
|
53:00:00 |
Amendment of section 206C |
1/4/05 |
2.1 This FB05
proposes to insert definition of "Zero Coupon Bond" (ZCB). It is
provided that ZCB means a bond issued on or after 1-6-2005 by
any infrastructure capital company or infrastructure capital
fund or public sector company. (hereinafter referred to as three
entities)
2.2 Clause (x) in
sub-section (3) of section 194A w.e.f. 1st June 2005 is inserted
to provide that no TDS is to be made on income, which is paid or
payable by any of the above three entities in relation to ZCB,
thus the provisions of section 194A(1) requiring TDS on interest
shall not apply to such ZCB.
3.1 In case of
certain transport operators, plying, hiring or leasing goods
carriages, profits and gains of business are computed on a
presumptive basis u/s. 44AE at the rate of Rs. 3,500 per month
for each heavy goods vehicle and Rs. 3,150 p.m. for each vehicle
other than heavy goods vehicle.
3.2 Two provisos are
proposed to be added after the first proviso to section 194C
(3). Said sub-section provides that no deduction shall be made
under either of sub-sections (1) and (2) in respect of what is
provided thereat.
3.3 Amendment
proposes that no deduction of tax is to be made if the transport
operator (individual) is a sub-contractor and who plies, hires
or leases goods carriages but has not owned more than two goods
carriages at any time during the previous year. Condition
prescribed is that sub-contractor has to produce a declaration
to the deductor in the prescribed form and verified in the
prescribed manner and within the time as may be prescribed. The
person responsible for paying any sum to the sub-contractor is
also required to furnish to the IT authority etc the form as may
be prescribed.
4.1 The Finance
(No.2) Act, 2004 has amended 3 sections – 199, 203 & 206C (also
section 139(9)) in relation to bringing in the new system of TDS
certificates w.e.f. 1-4-2005. Certificates are to be
dematerialised and the deductee is then not required to obtain
forms 16A and furnish the same with the Return of Income. It
appears that system is not yet ready for launch on 1-4-2005. The
memorandum to the FB05 states:
"The new system of
tax accounting under OLTAS is gradually stabilising and is yet
to attain full perfection. Secondly, the entries relating to tax
deduction need to be flawlessly captured at all the stages
beginning from the deposit of tax deducted by the deductor into
the bank and from the bank to NSDL. Therefore, it will be some
time before the existing requirement of filing TDS certificates
as proof of tax deducted at source can be done away with. There
will be a need to produce the TDS certificate as proof of the
tax deducted at source."
Hence, the new system
is presently postponed to 1-4-2006. It may not be out of place
to say that what was obvious to everyone was not accepted by the
department. Everyone knew that if the system is commenced w.e.f.
1-4-2005, it would create a mess. In my article in the IT Review
of July, 2004 in the Special Story on the Finance (No.2) Act,
2004, I wrote after listing the changes made in relation to TDS
certificates dematerialisation programe :
"3.5 Above are
sweeping changes and the Income Tax (IT) department is moving
towards Information Technology (IT) world and towards
electronic-world. However, it would have been advisable to
move little slowly and keep for at least one year both systems
– physical forms and statements to operate concurrently."
4.2 I would say that
there is no question of OLTAS attaining full perfection. It is
obvious that it is not ready at all, so the department does not
even consider concurrent operation but completely postpones the
new scheme. We again recommend as above, at least for one year
both the schemes should operate concurrently.
4.3 In sections 199,
203 and 206C amendments are proposed to postpone the operation
of new system of granting credit for TDS by one year : Now the
new system will see the light of the day hopefully from 1st
April, 2006 and not 1st April 2005. Similar amendment is made in
the explanation (1)(c) to section 139(9) changing date from
1-4-2005 to 1-4-2006.
4.4 The Finance
(No.2) Act, 2004 has amended / inserted few more sections in
relation to this new system for granting credit of TDS amount.
Section 200 is amended and it provides for 4 quarterly returns
to be furnished, section 203AA is inserted to provide for
furnishing of tax deduction statement to all deductees by the
income-tax authority. Surprisingly, no amendments are proposed
in these two sections. Probably, intention appears to be to
experiment on this new system in the y.e. 31-3-2006 by requiring
all deductors to furnish quarterly returns and income-tax
authority to furnish tax-deduction statement to all deductees.
If that is so, results will not be available by the time FB06 is
introduced on 28-2-2006 nor even by 31-3-2006 as the income-tax
authority will send such statement only "within the prescribed
time after the end of each financial year". No notifications
have been issued so far in the context of sections 200(3) and
203AA.
Anyway, since the
infrastructure required for the new system to function is not
ready, the plan to dematerialise the TDS certificates is
postponed by one year. Let us hope, that the next Finance Bill
does not contain same amendments for one further year.
4.5 In conclusion of
my article on T.D.S and T.C.S. covering amendments made in the
Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 what I wrote I repeat here:
"The provisions
dealing with the subjects of tax deducted and/or collected at
source are no doubt tedious but they are also very sensitive
and, if one can so say, are also delicate."
Three amendments (in
sections 199, 203 & 206C) analysed above on one hand will
increase responsibilities of the deductors and hopefully,
eventually reduce the same considerably (no doubt double
responsibility in the year ended 31-3-2006). Let us hope that
change over to the new system of TDS / TCS accounting grants
full credit to all deductees for TDS & TCS and ensures more
comfort.
5.1 The last proposal
for the amendment to be dealt with is the insertion of new
section 206A.
5.2 In his budget
speech, Finance Minister proposed two anti tax-evasion measures,
one being Bank Cash transaction tax and other being, what is
proposed in the new section 206A.
5.3 Section 194A
deals with TDS on ‘other interest’ including interest on time
deposits with banking companies. TDS is to be made only when
such interest during the year exceeds Rs. 5,000 per each branch
of the banking company. Hence, any interest upto Rs. 5,000
escapes the eyes of the income-tax department.
5.4 Now, sub-section
(1) of proposed new section 206A provides as under:
"206A.(1) Any banking
company or co-operative society or public company referred to in
the proviso to clause (i) of sub-section (3) of section 194A
responsible for paying to a resident any income not exceeding
five thousand rupees by way of interest (other than interest on
securities), shall prepare quarterly returns for the period
ending on the 30th June, the 30th September, the 31st December
and the 31st March in each financial year and deliver or cause
to be delivered to the prescribed income-tax authority or the
person authorised by such authority the quarterly returns as
aforesaid, in the prescribed form, verified in such manner and
within such time as may be prescribed, on a floppy , diskette,
magnetic, cartridge tape, CDROM or any other computer readable
media."
5.5 Before, I deal
with the above provision I may point out that reference to
"public company" in above as referred to in section 194A is :
"Public company,
which is formed and registered in India with the main object of
carrying on the business of providing long-term finance for
construction or purchase of houses in India for residential
purposes and which is eligible for deduction under clause (viii)
of sub-section (1) of section 36."
5.6 Voluminous
information, which above referred three categories of persons
will have to capture and furnish to the income-tax authority is
mind-boggling. I understand that time deposits in the banking
system alone are Rs.14,34,609 crores besides what are in the
other two; i.e., co-operative societies and relevant public
companies. What percentage of these time deposits are in such
sums and for such period that interest during the year is up to
Rs.5,000 only is anyone’s guess. It is a known fact that to
avoid rigours of TDS many persons make deposits in small amounts
with different banks and different branches. They will now be
tracked and will "leave trail" to be located. If time deposits
are of "white" money and interest is being accounted they have
nothing to worry except to undergo trouble of answering
enquiries from the income-tax authority but if time-deposits are
of "black" money and/or interest is not being accounted, they
may get caught.
While objective may
be good, records that will pour with tax-authorities will be
unmanageable. Imagine if 20% of time deposits out of
Rs.14,34,609 crores; i.e., nearly Rs. 2,86,000 crores are held
in small deposits for short period, number of deposits would be
staggering, may be yielding interest of approximately 17
thousand crores, each transaction of less than Rs.5,001 during
the year. How each bank will prepare and furnish such data is
beyond imagination. Chances are many time-deposits will fly away
from the banking system and new avenues of storing black money
and/or earning black money would be discovered.
5.7 Though in section
194A, limit of interest of Rs.5,000 is linked with branch of a
banking company etc. section 206A requires each banking company
etc paying interest not exceeding Rs. 5,000. As the section is
drafted, it will become mismatched with the provisions of
Section 194A. Assuming bank is able to prepare such a
consolidated list covering interest paid by all branches (which
as such appears to be extremely difficult, if not impossible),
many names may end with interest of more than Rs. 5000 and their
names may escape from the list to be forwarded to the income-tax
authority and they would also not get listed under form 26
required to be furnished in relation to TDS on interest because
per branch interest is less than Rs.5,001.
5.8.1 Sub section (2)
of proposed section 206A provides that the Central Government
may require any person, other than a person mentioned in
sub-section (1) to prepare quarterly returns for payments for
items covered under TDS sections; e.g., Salaries, Contractors’
payments, Commission, Rent, Professional fees etc. on which no
tax is deducted at source and that too to be submitted in some
computer readable media.
5.8.2 The way
sub-section (2) is drafted, three entities mentioned in
sub-section (1) cannot be asked to furnish information of
payment of non-tax-deductible amounts for items other than
interest.
5.9 Look forward for
plethora of information being gathered. Good luck to the Finance
Minister’s ideas to unearth black money.
There is a famous
saying: When diamond is in your pocket, you go round the world
looking for it! Is this saying appropriate here? You judge.