‘Justice delayed is justice denied’, is a well-known saying. Pendency of
litigation is a long-standing problem of great concern to all of us. One such
pendency is as regards the tax appeals pending before the High Courts. The
Government has recently found a solution for these pending appeals by
constituting National Tax Tribunal. The Parliament has ultimately passed the
National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 for disposal of tax appeals which are presently
within the jurisdiction of the High Courts. The Act will come into force on such
date as the Central Government may notify. The object of this change is claimed
to be speedy disposal of the appeals pending before the High Courts. Relevant
portion of the "Statement of Objects and Reasons" stated while introducing the
Bill reads as under:
"Under the direct tax enactments, an appeal lies to the High
Court on a substantial question of law. Due to pendency of a large number of
cases in the High Courts, huge revenue is blocked in such litigation. This is
adversely affecting the national economy. Hence urgent measures are required to
be taken to speed up taxation matters pending before the High Courts. To achieve
the aforesaid objective, it is proposed to establish a Tax Tribunal to be known
as the National Tax Tribunal to hear the cases of substantial question of law
from the decision of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal and the Customs, Excise
and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal."
Originally, the Government had made an attempt to constitute
a National Tax Tribunal by an ordinance issued by the President in October 2003.
The provisions of the ordinance and the manner of in which the new Tribunal was
sought to be introduced by way of ordinance without waiting for the Parliament
session raised a serious doubt as regards the real intention of constituting the
National Tax Tribunal. Such introduction was strongly protested by the
professionals and the public. The courts granted stay of the operation of the
ordinance. Ultimately the ordinance lapsed. Considerable improvement has been
made in the new Act. Some more improvement may be necessary for achieving the
object in real sense. An attempt is required to be made so as to achieve the
standard and quality of justice that would have been available from the High
Courts. It would be of utmost importance to take care in respect of the
independence of the Tribunal and that there would be no executive or Government
interference, direct or indirect, in the judicial function of the Tribunal.
All appeals and references under direct and indirect tax laws
that are pending before the High Courts on the notified date are required to be
transferred to the National Tax Tribunal. The National Tax Tribunal will dispose
of such matters. After the notified date the assessees and the department
aggrieved by an order passed by the Appellate Tribunals under direct and
indirect taxes will have to file appeal before the National Tax Tribunal. Such
an appeal is required to be filed within a period of 120 days from the date of
receipt of the order of the Appellate Tribunal. The National Tax Tribunal has
power to condone the delay of only 60 days if the appellant gives sufficient
cause. Sub-section (4) of section 15 requires that the assessee appellant has to
pay 25% of the disputed tax before filing the appeal. Further the proviso
therein empowers the National Tax Tribunal to wave this requirement and admit
the appeal if the assessee satisfies that undue hardship will be caused if the
condition for deposit is insisted upon. Such waiver of the condition can be
subject to some safeguard by way of security in the interest of revenue.
Constitution of the National Tax Tribunal is a new solution
to the old problem. In 1998, considering the pendency of references a new
section 260A providing for appeal to High Court was introduced. That did not
solve the problem. Instead of addressing the reasons and appointing the required
number of judges for tax matters in the High Court the Government has opted for
a new trial by constituting the National Tax Tribunal. In due course we would
come to know the drawbacks in this new system and again will be trying to find a
new solution in a similar manner. Instead, it may be better to have a new look
to the issue and the problem and solve the problems faced by the High Courts in
disposing of the tax matters. At least in Bombay High Court, the main problem is
that the department is not ready to go on with the matter. If this problem is
addressed where the solution is with the Government and the department
substantial pendency of tax matters in the High Courts will be reduced and there
would be on reason to justify the new set up of National Tax Tribunal.
Therefore, it would be necessary to have a new look to the real problem before
giving effect to the new Act and transferring the matters from the High Courts
to the National Tax Tribunal.
Special Story – Securities and Taxation
With the introduction of Securities Transaction Tax and the
consequent changes in income tax the Journal Committee felt the need of the
Special Story on "Securities and Taxation". In this Special Story it is intended
to explain the concept of securities and to analyse the relevant provisions of
taxation. I thank Shri Bhavesh Vora and Shri Yatin Vyavaharkar for designing the
Special Story. I am also thankful to all the authors for giving their articles
in time.
After relaxing in the pleasant weather and enjoying the
Christmas vacation you must have passed a resolution for the new year for your
professional and personal life. Let us all resolve to work for the betterment of
the profession and our country. I wish all of you a