TDS & TCS
The Government can exercise its power to levy and collect
tax only in accordance with Article 265 of the Constitution of India, which
provides that ‘no tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of
law’. Therefore, there should be specific provision in the taxing statute
for charge of tax and for collection of tax.
There are three stages in imposition of a tax. In the first
stage there is the declaration of liability that is the part of the statute
which determines what persons in respect of what property are liable. Next,
there is the assessment. Liability does not depend on assessment that ex
hypothesi has already been fixed. But the assessment determines the exact
sum which a person liable has to pay. Lastly, comes the method for recovery.
Thus, the first part of a taxing statute contains the charging provisions, the
second part contains the provisions for computation of tax and the third part
contains provisions for payment, recovery and collection of tax.
Under the Income-tax Act, 1961, Chapter II consisting of
sections 4 to 9 provide for the basis of charge and section 4 therein is the
main charging provision. Chapter XVII of the Act deals with ‘Collection and
Recovery of tax’. This Chapter provides for the following four methods of
collection and recovery:
-
Deduction of tax at source. (TDS)
-
Collection of tax at source. (TCS)
-
Advance payment of tax.
-
Collection and recovery after demand.
The first two methods, which are indirect methods of
collection are the most important ones and major portion of the revenue is
recovered by these methods. The tax deducted or collected at source and paid
to the Government is credited to the account of the assessee and as such
amounts to payment of tax by or on behalf of the assessee. If the tax deducted
or collected is short of the liability then the balance is payable or
recoverable in the other two modes. If the tax deducted or collected is in
excess of the liability then the assessee would be entitled to the refund of
the excess amount.
The provisions for TDS and TCS are only the alternatives
amongst the four methods of ‘Collection and Recovery of tax’. The liability of
an assessee to tax does not depend on or get altered on account of the
provisions for TDS or TCS. The basic liability of an assessee to pay tax
directly always exists and continues irrespective of the provisions for TDS
and TCS. Section 191 of the Act specifically provides that if the tax has not
been deducted in accordance with the provisions, the assessee would be liable
to pay the balance tax directly.
Primarily the liability to pay tax is on the assessee and
the obligation to collect is on the Government. A third party has no role to
play. However, the provisions for TDS and TCS have cast the obligation on the
third party to deduct or collect tax on behalf of the Government and also has
provided for a liability in case of non-compliance of the obligation. The
Government expects free services from such third parties and pays no
remuneration for such services. The provisions for TDS and TCS are mandatory
and non-compliance would result in serious and harsh consequence of treating
such third party as an assessee in default, interest, penalty and prosecution.
One basic point which has always been ignored as regards the consequences is
that the liability to pay tax is primarily on the assessee and this liability
is never transferred. The Government cannot collect more than what is
chargeable under the statute either directly or indirectly. The liability
under the provisions of TDS and TCS is only the secondary liability and cannot
exist independent of the primarily liability of the assessee. Therefore, if
the assessee himself is not liable to tax or if the assessee has already paid
the tax amount then the secondary liability under the provisions of TDS and
TCS cannot operate. In such a case, there should be no adverse consequences on
account of non deduction or non collection of tax at source. However, there
have been contrary views on this issue. In some cases, the courts have taken
the view that where the assessee has made the payment of the tax liability,
there would be no case of non-compliance and no adverse consequences would
follow by non deduction of tax at source. In some other cases, the courts have
taken the view that the provisions for TDS are mandatory provisions which cast
an independent obligation on the payer and the non-compliance would result in
penal consequences irrespective of the fact that there is no outstanding tax
liability in the case of the assessee. Explanation to section 191 inserted by
the Finance Act, 2003 w.e.f. 01/06/2003 would throw some light on this issue.
The said Explanation reads as under:
"Explanation.-For the removal of doubts, it is
hereby declared that if any person referred to in section 200 and in the case
referred to in section 194, the principal officer and the company of which he
is the principal officer does not deduct the whole or any part of the tax and
such tax has not been paid by the assessee directly, then, such person, the
principal officer and the company shall, without prejudice to any other
consequences which he or it may incur, be deemed to be an assessee in default
as referred to in sub-section (1) of section 201 in respect of such tax."
In view of this Explanation, if the tax has been paid by
the assessee directly then the non deduction of tax would not result in
treating the payer of the amount as an assessee in default. This Explanation,
accordingly, would support the first view, which is fair and reasonable.
However, the Explanation has been made effective from 01/06/2003. Therefore,
the question would arise in respect of the past cases. However, in view of the
fact that the Explanation is clarificatory the benefit of the Explanation
should be available for the past cases also.
Sections 192 to 203AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 deal with
the provisions for ‘Deduction of tax at source’ and section 206C and 206CA
deal with the provisions for ‘Collection of tax at source’. The provisions for
‘Collection of tax at source’ are new provisions and were first time
introduced by the Finance Act, 1988 w.e.f. 01/06/1988.
SPECIAL STORY – TDS AND TCS UNDER INCOME TAX LAW:
Keeping in mind the importance of the subject, the Journal
Committee has selected this Special Story on ‘TDS and TCS under Income tax
Law’ for this month. The authors have exhaustively dealt with all the aspects
analysing the intricacies of the provisions. I thank Shri Pradeep Shah for his
efforts in designing the Special Story. I also thank Shri Atul Suraiya and
Shri Naresh Dharia for co-ordinating the Special Story. I am also thankful to
all the authors for giving their articles in time.
K. B. Bhujle
Editor