Bar’s Responsibility
First of all let me wish all
readers Happy and Prosperous New Year. Last year because of unavoidable
circumstances I could not devote as an editor sufficient time towards the
Journal. As a New Year resolution I promise my readers that myself and my entire
team shall make up for the lapses of the last year.
We have dedicated this issue to
the selected decisions delivered in the last two years by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court. Many important decisions have been delivered by the Apex Court in the
past two years. However, on going through Supreme Court decisions delivered in
the last decade or two we found out that apparently some of the decisions of the
Hon’ble Court are in conflict with it’s earlier decisions. For this impasse I
squarely blame the Bar particularly the Taxation Bar. Till today we have not put
in place a system whereby whenever an important issue comes before the Hon’ble
Supreme Court all concerned with the issues get the information, so that the
associations interested in safeguarding the interests of the Assessee may come
together to assist the Court. I regretfully note that sometimes the
representation before the Hon’ble Supreme Court is very poor particularly in
taxation issues. Many important decisions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court itself
have not been brought to the notice of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, which leads to
conflicting new decisions which leads to uncertainty in law.
As a Bar, we have to have some establishment in Delhi, which will keep watch on
the issues coming up before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and intimate all concerned
throughout the country So that the associations concerned with the fair
administration of taxation laws will come to know about the same and if required
shall make appropriate arrangements to intervene to assist the Court. This
system may be able to ensure that the Apex Court arrives at a conclusion after
considering the earlier rulings on the same point by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
This is very important as a ruling by the Apex Court becomes the law of the land
as per the provisions of Article 141 of the Constitution of India. We are not
doubting the fairness and capacity of the Supreme Court judges. Looking at the
mounting pendency before the Apex Court, it would be practically impossible for
the judges of the Hon’ble Supreme Court to go through the issue before them
thoroughly unless able assistance is provided by the Bar.
My appeal is to all the
organizations whether they are statutory or voluntary. It shall be in the
interest of all those who are interested in laying down a correct and well
considered principles of law by the Apex Court. I thank all the authors for
sparing their valuable time to contribute to this issue of Income Tax Review.
V. H. Patil
Editor