Goetze (I) Ltd. vs. CIT (284
ITR 323, SC)
For the A.Y. 1995-96 the
assessee filed its return on 30th November, 1995 and on 12th January, 1998 and
sought to claim a deduction by way of a letter addressed to the A.O. The said
claim was not allowed by the A.O. on the ground that there was no provision in
the Act allowing an amendment in the return without a revised return. The
Tribunal and the High Court upheld the order of the A.O. Before the Supreme
Court relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of National
Thermal Power Company Limited vs. CIT (229 ITR 383) it was contended that it
was open to the assessee to raise the points of law for the first time before
the Appellate Tribunal.
Their Lordships held that in
the case of National Thermal Power Company Limited (supra) a question was that
the power of the Tribunal was to entertain for the first time a point of law
provided the facts are on the record. This decision does not in any relate to
the power of the A.O. to entertain a claim for deduction otherwise than by
filing a revised return. Therefore, the civil appeal of the assessee was
dismissed.
Editorial Note :
This decision has far
reaching consequences inasmuch as a claim of an assessee can be rejected at
the threshold by the A.O. relying on this decision on the ground that the
assessee had not filed a revised return for claiming deduction and thereafter
the assessee will be without any recourse for claiming the said deduction.
However this decision cannot be invoked when the assessee is revising or
rectifying his claim of deduction before the A.O.
CIT vs. Kwality Biscuits Ltd.
(284 ITR 434).
The Karnataka High Court (243
ITR 519) held that interest was not leviable u/ss. 234B and 234C of the Act on
the basis of book profits u/s. 115J since the entire exercise of computing
income u/s. 115J could only be done at the end of the financial year and the
provisions of sections 207, 208, 209 and 210 could not be made applicable
until and unless the accounts were audited and the balance sheet prepared. The
appeals of the Department against this decision were dismissed by the Supreme
Court.